MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4311591694 · doi:10.1109/ipc53466.2022.9975665

Security Performance of Physical-Layer Encryption Based on Randomized Phase Space in Optical Fiber Communication

2022· article· en· W4311591694 on OpenAlexafffund
Kh Arif Shahriar, Mostafa Khalil, Adrian Chan, Lawrence R. Chen, Randy Kuang, David V. Plant

Bibliographic record

Venue2022 IEEE Photonics Conference (IPC) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
Topicgraph theory and CDMA systems
Canadian institutionsQuantropi (Canada)McGill University
FundersMitacs
KeywordsEavesdroppingEncryptionPhysical layerComputer scienceComputer networkFiberOptical communicationComputer securityMaterials scienceOptoelectronicsTelecommunicationsWireless

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

By exploring different eavesdropping scenarios, we investigate the security of an optical communication system at 200 Gb/s over 80 km of SMF that implements physical-layer encryption in a pseudo-3-party round-trip mechanism. The results provide significant insights into the requirements for ensuring security of the system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.143
Threshold uncertainty score0.883

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2022 IEEE Photonics Conference (IPC)Same topicgraph theory and CDMA systemsFrench-language works237,207