MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4311603015 · doi:10.1093/ejcts/ezac554

Maximizing lymph node dissection from fresh lung cancer specimens

2022· article· en· W4311603015 on OpenAlexaff
Cédric Raymond, Arthur Vieira, Philippe Joubert, Paula A. Ugalde

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalInstitut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLymphMedicineLymph nodeDissection (medical)Lung cancerMediastinal lymph nodeLungRadiologyLung cancer stagingMediastinumCancerPathologyInternal medicineMetastasisMediastinoscopy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Evaluation of lymph nodes during lung cancer resection is essential for pathologic staging and adjuvant treatment decisions. We developed a standardized approach for grossing resected lobes and segments to better assign the N1 category to hilar and peripheral lymph nodes. Lung specimens were dissected centrifugally from the bronchial stump, and all lymph nodes at the segmental and subsegmental bifurcations were removed. When combined with mediastinal lymph node dissection, this approach will likely maximize the number of lymph nodes analysed and improve the accuracy of pathologic N descriptor classification.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of Cardio-Thoracic SurgerySame topicLung Cancer Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207