Dimension of heterogeneous network architecture formed in emulsion cross‐linking copolymerization
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The mean‐square radius of gyration Rg 2 and the graph diameter D of highly heterogeneous network polymers formed in emulsion vinyl/divinyl copolymerization are investigated to find a linear relationship, Rg 2 = a D . The proportionality coefficient, a , is dominated by the cycle (circuit) rank, k c , or the number of intramolecular cross‐links. The magnitude of a is slightly larger than that for the random cross‐linked network polymers, but the functional form of a ( k c ) is simply proportional to that for the random networks proposed earlier. This relationship makes it possible to determine Rg 2 based on D and k c , enabling quick estimation of Rg 2 for large network polymers. It is found that the contraction factor g of the present heterogeneous network polymer is larger than that for the homogeneous networks formed through random cross‐linking of polymer chains. The ratio of these two contraction factors is kept constant, irrespective of the magnitude of k c .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".