MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4311614190 · doi:10.1093/ofid/ofac492.115

1649. Ceftolozane-Tazobactam or Ceftazidime-Avibactam Versus Best Available Therapy in the Treatment of Difficult-to-Treat Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infections: a Retrospective Comparative Effectiveness Analysis of 195 U.S. Hospitals, 2016–2020

2022· article· en· W4311614190 on OpenAlexaff
Alexander Lawandi, Ahmed Ullah Mishuk, Christina Yek, Amy Yu, Xiaobai Li, Jeffrey R. Strich, Sadia Sarzynski, Sarah Warner, Sameer S. Kadri

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Forum Infectious Diseases · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAntibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCeftazidime/avibactamCeftazidimePoisson regressionTazobactamAntibioticsPseudomonas aeruginosaIntensive care medicineRetrospective cohort studyPiperacillin/tazobactamAvibactamInternal medicineEmergency medicineAntibiotic resistancePiperacillinImipenemMicrobiologyPopulationBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Infections due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa displaying difficult-to-treat resistance (DTR-PA) necessitate the use of sub-efficacious and/or toxic “reserve” antibiotics and are associated with considerable morbidity and mortality. Ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVY) and ceftolozane-tazobactam (CEF-TAZO) are novel ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitors (BLBLI) that tend to retain in vitro activity against DTR-PA. However, little is known about their in vivo effectiveness compared to reserve agents. Methods Inpatients aged ≥ 18 years with ≥1 blood, urine, respiratory, or body fluid culture growing DTR-PA who received targeted therapy with either CAZ-AVY, CEF-TAZO, or Best-Available Therapy (BAT) were identified in the Premier Healthcare Database. Primary outcome was in-hospital mortality or discharge to hospice and secondary outcome was length of hospital stay (LOS) for survivors. The primary outcome was compared for CAZ-AVY vs CEF-TAZO and novel agents (CAZ-AVY or CEF-TAZO) vs BAT using overlap weighting and binomial regression with downstream adjustment controlling for patient and treatment characteristics. The secondary outcomes were compared using overlap weighting and poisson regression with downstream adjustment controlling for patient and treatment characteristics. Results Between 2016 and 2020, 1,552 patients with DTR-PA infections were identified at 105 hospitals, of which 202 (13.0%) were treated with CAZ-AVY, 906 (58.4%) with CEF-TAZO, and 444 (28.6%) with BAT. Patient characteristics were similar among treatment groups (Table 1, Table 2). Overall crude mortality was 15.5%. The adjusted risk of mortality was lower in patients treated with CAZ-AVI (12.5%, 95% CI 7.9–17.1) vs CEF-TAZO (18.8%, 95% CI 15.9–21.8) for a risk difference of 6.3% (95% 1.1–11.5, p = 0.02). The novel agents were not associated with a reduced mortality risk when collectively compared to BAT (risk difference -1.1%, 95% CI -5.4; 3.2%). LOS favoured novel agents and were comparable for CAZ-AVY and CEF-TAZO. Conclusion In this real-world observational study of patients with DTR-PA infections, the novel ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitors were comparably effective against BAT, though the use of CAZ-AVY was associated with a reduced mortality compared to CEF-TAZO. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.039
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen Forum Infectious DiseasesSame topicAntibiotic Resistance in BacteriaFrench-language works237,207