Management of Business Projects of the Enterprise as a Factor of Increasing International Competitiveness in the Conditions of Global Sustainability
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The article is devoted to the substantiation of the conceptual aspects of business project management, which is caused by the aggravation of international competition in the context of the establishment of sustainable development. The purpose of the study is to substantiate theoretical and methodological principles of the business projects management of enterprises, which will contribute to increasing international competitiveness in the conditions of global sustainability. The research used resource and system approaches, as well as the principles of purposefulness, interaction and efficiency of business project management. The functional dependence of the business project management is substantiated. Directions for improving the business projects management in the area of critical deviations of the trajectory of the project state are proposed. It has been proven that the randomness and uncontrollability of events form the variability of the expected value of the result of the business project management and expands the range of searching for the goals achievement with the deviation minimization of the project execution trajectory from the planned one. It has been justified that taking into account and increasing managerial, methodological, financial, production, scientific and innovative and marketing potentials contributes to increasing the competitiveness of enterprises in the international market in the conditions of global sustainability.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".