Heterogeneity of White Matter Hyperintensity and Cognitive Impairment in Patients with Acute Lacunar Stroke
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: The severity of white matter hyperintensity (WMH) in patients with acute lacunar stroke (ALS) may be not completely parallel to cognitive impairment. Controversies persist about the effects of WMH on cognitive dysfunction. It is vital to explore whether the association may be affected by certain factors and whether a subsequent subgroup analysis is necessary. The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between WMH and cognitive impairment in acute lacunar stroke patients and the possible causal factors. Methods: We continuously enrolled patients with ALS who were hospitalized at the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University between October 2017 and June 2022. The cognitive function of all patients was assessed by using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scale 14 ± 2 days after the onset of AIS, and the results were adjusted to the education level. The MoCA scale was reevaluated at the 6-month (day 182 ± 7) follow-up by outpatient visit or video. Demographic and clinical data were collected. The manifestations of chronic cerebral small-vessel disease (CSVD), including the total Fazekas score and total CSVD burden score, were assessed with an MRI scan. A mismatch refers to an inconsistency between the severity of WMH and cognitive dysfunction. A Type 1 mismatch refers to cognitive impairment with mild WMH (total Fazekas score = 0−1), and a Type 2 mismatch refers to severe WMH (total Fazekas score = 5−6) in patients with normal cognitive function. Results: Among 213 enrolled ALS patients, 66 patients (31.0%) had cognitive dysfunction, and 40 patients (18.8%) had mismatches. Twenty-seven cases (12.7%) were Type 1 mismatched, and seventeen cases (8.0%) were Type 2 mismatched. Age, gender, fibrinogen and cerebral infarction history were independent risk factors for cognitive impairment in ALS patients. Imaging features, including moderate to severe WMH, deep WMH and the total CSVD burden score, were also independently associated with cognitive impairment. The patients in the mismatched group were older, had more severe deep WMH and had a higher occurrence of depression (p < 0.05). The NIHSS score, depression and microbleeds were significantly different between the Type 1 mismatched group and the matched group (p = 0.018, p = 0.012 and p = 0.047). Patients in the Type 2 mismatched group were male (p = 0.04), had a lower level of fibrinogen (p = 0.005), a lower incidence of CMBs (p = 0.003), a lower total CSVD burden score (p = 0.017), more severe paraventricular WMH (p = 0.035) and milder deep WMH (p = 0.026). Conclusions: Our study examined a homogeneous study cohort of recruited patients with symptomatic ALS. We found heterogeneity between WMH and cognitive function in ALS patients. Despite a similar WMH severity, some baseline clinical features and other conventional CSVD imaging characteristics may account for this heterogeneity phenomenon. Our findings provide data for the early diagnosis and prevention of cognitive impairment in ALS patients and suggest that the severity of WMH is not completely parallel to cognitive impairment. The white matter microstructural injury and remote WMH effects may account for the mismatch phenomenon. More attention should be paid to understanding the underlying mechanisms and finding new imaging markers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".