MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4311635227 · doi:10.6000/1929-5995.2022.11.07

A Simplified Analytical Solution for the Computation of Machine Path in Filament Winding of Cylindrical Angle-Ply and Double-Double Structures

2022· article· en· W4311635227 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Artem Andrianov, A.P.F. Militão

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Research Updates in Polymer Science · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicTextile materials and evaluations
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMandrelFilament windingComputationMaterials sciencePath (computing)GeodesicRotation (mathematics)Structural engineeringProtein filamentComputer scienceGeometryComposite materialEngineeringAlgorithmMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a simplified computation approach for the machine path (or winding trajectory) of grid structures and tubes with a circular cross-section and angle-ply or double-double layup. The solution for the machine path is given through controllable degrees of freedom of a low-cost two-axis filament winding machine (FWM): mandrel rotation and translation of the delivery eye along the axis of the mandrel. The efficiency of the analytical solution for the machine path of the FWM was ascertained by automated laying the cotton thread over the geodesic and non-geodesic groove imprinted on the surface of a cylindrical polylactide mandrel. These results validated the possibility of manufacturing cylindrical composite structures with an angle-ply layup or double-double stacking sequence, without the need for expensive software, making the winding technology accessible to society and promoting university extension.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.340
Threshold uncertainty score0.308

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.103
GPT teacher head0.422
Teacher spread0.320 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Research Updates in Polymer ScienceSame topicTextile materials and evaluationsFrench-language works237,207