MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4311644690 · doi:10.1503/cjs.016022

Correction to: “Efficacy of surgical skin preparation solutions in hip arthroplasty: a prospective randomized trial”

2022· article· en· W4311644690 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Surgery · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBody Contouring and Surgery
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineRandomized controlled trialArthroplastyHip arthroplastyTotal hip arthroplastySurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

C JS has been made aware that the article, “Efficacy of surgical skin preparation solutions in hip arthroplasty: a prospective randomized trial,” published on November 16, 2022,[1][1] should have included the following acknowledgement: The authors thank Lori Moon for assistance with participant

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.022
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.200
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.073
Threshold uncertainty score0.243

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0220.200
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.005
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0060.002
Open science0.0050.002
Research integrity0.0090.015
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0730.020

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of SurgerySame topicBody Contouring and SurgeryFrench-language works237,207