Transformation of Images of Perception of Socio-Political Changes in Florence in the Last Quarter of the XIV- Early XV Centuries.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
В статье идет речь об особенностях восприятия социально-политических перемен флорентийскими гражданами в последней четверти XIV – начале XV в., когда была свергнута диктатура партии гвельфов, поставлен предел режиму младших цехов, и городское общество вернулось к республиканским порядкам, достигнув относительного равновесия участвующих в управлении структур – старших и младших цехов, а также вернувшихся в город архигвельфов. Это отразилось в восприятии граждан, как достижение социумом относительной гармонии в процветающем, добившемся значимых внешнеполитических успехов городе. Далее исследуется «цена победы»: ограничение норм флорентийской демократии в пользу формирующегося олигархического строя. The article deals with the peculiarities of the perception of socio-political changes by Florentine citizens in the last quarter of the XIV- early XV c., when the dictatorship of the Guelph Party was overthrown, a limit was set to the regime of junior workshops, and urban society returned to republican order, reaching a relative balance of structures involved in the management – senior and junior workshops, as well as those who returned to the city of the arch-elves. This was reflected in the perception of citizens as the achievement of relative harmony by society in a rich, prosperous city that has achieved significant foreign policy successes (inclusion in the sphere of the Florentine dominion of Arezzo and Pisa). Next, the "price of victory" is investigated: the restriction of the norms of Florentine democracy in favor of the emerging oligarchic system.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".