MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4311681013 · doi:10.22215/etd/2022-15334

The Bucolic, the Backwoods, and the In-Between: Navigating Desire in Atlantic Canadian Literature

2022· dissertation· en· W4311681013 on OpenAlexaffabout
Gemma Marr

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsCarleton UniversityUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNarrativeQueerThe ImaginaryHuman sexualityRepresentation (politics)CONTESTIdentity (music)AppropriationGender studiesLiteratureSociologyHistoryAestheticsArtPoliticsPhilosophyPsychoanalysisPsychologyPolitical scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Representations of Atlantic Canada in media, popular culture, and literature often depict the region as a space of rural simplicity or stagnancy.To contest these assumptions, this dissertation considers Atlantic Canadian literature from 1908 to 2019, with attention to what I see as a complex sense of identity emerging in the region which intersects with broader ideas about sexuality.For much of this period, discourses of normative sexuality spread across the country at the same time aspects of Atlantic Canadian experience were commodified and canonized.This dissertation identifies a limited, archetypal spectrum of representations running from bucolic nostalgia to backwoods ignorance.Despite the persistence of images which privilege understandings of the region as a heterosexual monolith, I suggest that within Atlantic Canadian literature there are texts that, in differing ways, trouble this view.To make this point, I explore a range of representations and their reception, from Anne of Green Gables (1908) and the Netflix adaptation Anne with an E (2017), to writing by Alistair MacLeod, David Adams Richards, and Wayne Johnston.To differing degrees, these texts remain popular in the nation's cultural imaginary, and I outline how their recognition influences which bodies, relations, and values become accepted as part of the social fabric of Atlantic Canada.I also explore the work of R.M. Vaughan, Ann-Marie MacDonald, Jaime Burnet, and others who complicate narratives of heteronormative space which are privileged in the national imagination.This push-pull of representation and experience embodies, I assert, a regional desiring, a concept which troubles binaries of insider/outsider, here/there, and rural/urban.Over time, this regional desiring impacts what is understood as an 'authentic' narrative of Atlantic Canadian experience; my dissertation suggests, therefore, that Atlantic Canadian fiction can be a site of transgression and resistance.iii Through it all, I argue that a complex desire for normative narratives of Atlantic Canada from arbiters of culture, funding bodies, and the reading public come into tension with the diverse reality of sexualities that exist in the region.Despite perceptions of Atlantic Canada as inherently conservative and traditional, an attitude that the region's literature is assumed to reinforce, the texts I explore raise questions about the intersections of space, time, and sexuality in an Atlantic Canadian context.I made my first attempt to write these acknowledgements while sitting along the Harbour Passage Trail in Saint John during the first week of September.I live here, again, in this place now known as New Brunswick, and there is a cyclicality in this return, at the end of my PhD journey, that I am grateful for.While reflecting on this place and time in my acknowledgments may seem odd, they are central to me and to this project.I want to acknowledge this place and this moment because without it my life would not be what it has become.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.117
Threshold uncertainty score0.851

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0360.047
Scholarly communication0.0140.004
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCanadian Identity and History→French-language works237,207→