MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4311681030 · doi:10.22215/etd/2022-15172

Conformal and Flexible Leaky-Wave Combline/Rampart Hybrid Antenna Arrays

2022· dissertation· en· W4311681030 on OpenAlexaff
Tomi Murto

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrowave Engineering and Waveguides
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLeaky wave antennaStub (electronics)StopbandOffset (computer science)Bent molecular geometryMaterials scienceClassification of discontinuitiesBroadsideAcousticsAntenna (radio)OptoelectronicsOpticsElectronic engineeringEngineeringElectrical engineeringPhysicsMicrostrip antennaComputer scienceComposite materialResonator

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A novel bent-stub hybrid combline/rampart leaky-wave antenna (LWA) is designed and fabricated on a flexible polyethylene terephthalate (PET) substrate, and experimentally verified on flat and curved surfaces. The open stopband (OSB) of a combline structure is suppressed by utilizing two asymmetric stubs per unit cell (UC). Meandering is then introduced in its feed and increases gain and scan range. The meandering allows more UCs to fit within the same length and, as a discontinuity itself known as a rampart antenna, also contributes to the radiation. Also, the scan range is increased due to a reduction in the period of the UC. Finally, the antenna is utilized in an array where the combline LWAs are offset by half of a period and intertwined for efficient spatial organization. Mutual coupling is controlled by bending the UC stubs inwards, along with an optimization of antenna separation. Control of the mutual coupling is shown to reduce any discontinuities in the gain around the broadside frequency of the LWA array. Single LWAs as well as arrays of two and four LWAs are manually fabricated on a PET substrate and tested, demonstrating good agreement with simulations. Furthermore, the performance of the flexible antennas is characterized on curved surfaces and shown to retain performance well at curvature radiuses of greater than 1000 mm. The closed stopband (CSB), consistent smooth and high gain and control over the mutual coupling of this LWA are important to applications such as multiple input, multiple output (MIMO) based wireless communications systems, where an array configuration is required.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMicrowave Engineering and WaveguidesFrench-language works237,207