MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4311681088 · doi:10.22215/etd/2022-15313

Atmospheric Methane Data Assimilation in the CMAQ Air Quality Model

2022· dissertation· en· W4311681088 on OpenAlexafffund
Seyyedsina Voshtani

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAtmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersNational Oceanic and Atmospheric AdministrationEnvironment and Climate Change CanadaCompute Canada
KeywordsData assimilationMethaneGreenhouse gasAir quality indexEnvironmental scienceCMAQCovarianceAtmospheric methaneMeteorologyParametric statisticsStatisticsMathematicsChemistryGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Atmospheric methane is a potent greenhouse gas (GHG) and the second-largest contributor to anthropogenic climate forcing.After stabilizing in the early 2000s, the global methane concentration has sharply risen since 2007, mainly due to human-related activities.Curbing the rise of methane concentrations entails identifying and reducing methane emissions, which may otherwise significantly impact climate and air quality.Due to their near-continuous global coverage, satellite observations of methane are often combined with chemical transport models (CTMs) to improve model concentrations and emissions estimates.Previous methane studies are still faced with significant gaps and challenges such that considerable discrepancies among their results have been reported consistently.On the estimation side, most studies assumed that the model is perfect and characterization of uncertainties is already optimal.Obtaining information on methane uncertainties using conventional approaches requires extensive computational resources compared to model integration.Furthermore, there is a lack of independent and objective evaluation of those estimated uncertainties.The first thesis objective is to develop a novel cost-efficient data assimilation framework capable of estimating error statistics using a CTM.This method is referred to as parametric variance Kalman filter (PvKF), which relies on continuous formulation of error covariance propagation without making the perfect model assumption.We test the validity of our assumptions and the performance of the PvKF assimilation using simulated GOSAT observations.iii Our next goal is to conduct near-optimal assimilation to represent the true methane field.Cross-validation offers an objective manner to characterize the success of the method.We extend that method to the satellite observations and multiple covariance parameter estimations.Using estimated error statistics and GOSAT observations, we found that the quality of the analysis substantially depends on the optimality of those error covariances.Lastly, we evaluate the use of PvKF assimilation in a source inversion context in comparison with a traditional 4D-Var inversion.Using Observing System Simulation Experiments (OSSEs), we verify the ability of our new inversion framework to recover a distribution of known emissions.Our results indicate that both the analysis field and its error covariance exert a tangible influence in lowering the bias and variance of the recovered emissions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.158
Threshold uncertainty score0.315

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAtmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics→French-language works237,207→