MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4311681289 · doi:10.22215/etd/2022-15239

Towards Computationally Fast and Electromagnetically Accurate Zero Thickness Sheet Models of Practical Metasurface Structures

2022· dissertation· en· W4311681289 on OpenAlexaff
Jordan Dugan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMetamaterials and Metasurfaces Applications
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSolverSurface (topology)ScatteringOpticsPhysicsDispersion (optics)DipoleComputational physicsMaterials scienceComputer scienceGeometryMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Electromagnetic metasurfaces are 2D arrays of sub-wavelength resonating particles whose microscopic properties can be tailored to achieve a desired macroscopic field scattering response. Determining the scattered fields from large metasurfaces consisting of small resonators constitutes a multi-scale problem. To remedy this, metasurfaces are modeled as zero thickness sheets described using surface susceptibilities in conjunction with the Generalized Sheet Transition Conditions (GSTCs). Here, the GSTCs are implemented in a Fast Multipole Method (FMM) accelerated integral equation (IE) solver to simulate metasurfaces embedded in complex environments. While the FMM-IE-GSTC solver works well, the standard dipolar surface susceptibility model of metasurfaces is inadequate for modeling structures exhibiting spatial dispersion. These spatially dispersive structures can be modeled using surface susceptibilities that are rational polynomial functions of the transverse wave-vector resulting in the extended GSTCs. In this thesis, the extended GSTCs are further developed to model non-uniform metasurfaces providing a computationally efficient zero thickness model for practical metasurfaces which is then integrated into the IE-GSTC solver.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.172
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMetamaterials and Metasurfaces ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207