Living without pain. Case series of patients with hereditary sensory and autonomic neuropathies in a Canadian tertiary care centre
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Hereditary sensory and autonomic neuropathies (HSANs) are a group of heterogeneous genetic disorders presenting predominantly with sensory and autonomic dysfunction. They are a diverse group of diseases of the peripheral nervous system characterized by profound distal sensory loss and various autonomic and motor disturbances. Objectives: The primary objective of this study was to describe the clinical presentation of children with HSAN to paediatricians. We present clinical features and genetic etiology of patients with HSAN followed in a Canadian tertiary paediatric centre, including suggestions for their monitoring, management, and long-term follow-up. Methods: A retrospective chart review of all patients with HSAN followed from the years 2000 through 2021 was performed. Collected data consisted of patients' demographics, clinical characteristics, imaging, and management. Results: Eight patients were included. The average age at diagnosis was 3.19 ± 2.83 years. Insensitivity to pain (100%), dysautonomia (100%), global development delay (87.5%), emesis (62.5%), and self-injury (62.5%) were the most prevalent manifestations of HSAN. The most common co-morbidities were gastroesophageal reflux disease (50%), obstructive sleep apnea (37.5%), attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (37.5%), and iron deficiency (37.5%). Management was multi-disciplinary, involving neurologists, orthopeds, developmental paediatricians, sleep specialists, and psychiatrists. Conclusion: HSANs are a diverse group of diseases, characterized by profound distal sensory loss, acral mutilations, and variable autonomic disturbances. It is important to recognize the diagnosis in the paediatrician's office in order to set up surveillance and prevent complications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".