MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4311750825 · doi:10.1088/1873-7005/acabe3

The wake of a rectangular flat plate

2022· article· en· W4311750825 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueFluid Dynamics Research · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid Dynamics and Vibration Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsWakeVortexVorticityPhysicsReynolds numberGeometryMechanicsBoundary layerPlane (geometry)Vortex sheddingHorseshoe vortexOpticsSplitter plateMathematicsTurbulence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The mean wake of a three-dimensional surface-mounted rectangular flat plate was studied experimentally in a low-speed wind tunnel for four different aspect (height-to-width) ratios, AR = 3, 2, 1, and 0.5. The Reynolds number based on the plate width was Re = 3.8 × 10 4 and the boundary layer thickness on the ground plane, relative to the plate width, was δ / W = 1.1. The incidence angle of the plate was varied from α = 0° (where the plate is normal to the flow) to α = 90° (where the plate is parallel to the flow). The mean velocity and vorticity fields in the wake were measured using a seven-hole pressure probe. At α = 0°, the length of the recirculation zone behind the plate becomes progressively shorter as the aspect ratio is lowered and follows the same tendency as that of a finite square prism. The wakes of the slenderer flat plates of AR = 3 and 2 are characterised by two pairs of streamwise vortices: a pair of tip vortices in the upper wake and a pair of ground-plane vortices on the lower edges of the wake. With increasing incidence angle, a single tip vortex comes to dominate the wake, secondary vorticity is induced at various locations, a ‘traffic light’ vortex pattern may form, and ultimately a familiar wing-tip (trailing) vortex develops. In contrast, flow downstream of the less slender flat plates of AR = 1 and 0.5 is characterised by a single pair of large streamwise vortices, which become asymmetric with increasing incidence. Close to the flat plate of AR = 0.5, and at small incidence angles only, a unique pair of small inner vorticity concentrations, of opposite sense of rotation to the main streamwise vortices, is found in the upper part of the wake.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.269
Threshold uncertainty score0.506

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it