MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4311782708 · doi:10.7870/cjcmh-2022-029

Travailler dans le milieu communautaire : perspectives des travailleurs quant aux demandes et aux ressources qui influencent leur santé psychologique

2022· article· fr· W4311782708 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Alexandra Giroux, Sophie Meunier, Amélie Doucet, François Lauzier‐Jobin, Stéphanie Radziszewski, Simon Coulombe, Janie Houle

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Community Mental Health · 2022
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealth, psychology, and well-being
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les travailleurs œuvrant auprès d’organismes communautaires sont essentiels pour le fonctionnement de la société puisqu’ils octroient des services aux clientèles vulnérables. Cependant, la littérature indique que ces travailleurs vivent à la fois plus de détresse et de bien-être que leurs homologues des secteurs publics et privés. Grâce à des groupes de discussion réalisés auprès de travailleurs communautaires québécois (n = 20), cette étude identifie des demandes et des ressources au travail ayant des répercussions sur leur santé psychologique. Les résultats contribuent à une meilleure compréhension des facteurs influençant la santé psychologique des travailleurs et à une réflexion sur l’amélioration de leurs conditions de travail.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.348
Threshold uncertainty score0.691

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0100.008
Scholarly communication0.0070.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.089
GPT teacher head0.433
Teacher spread0.344 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2022
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Community Mental HealthSame topicHealth, psychology, and well-beingFrench-language works237,207