Time Series Analysis and Prediction on Bitcoin
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Bitcoin is the most famous digital currency in the world and has become an investment asset. Prediction is one of the important matters in the investment market. In the economic field, there are different studies on the reasons for the price change of Bitcoin and how to predict the price trend of Bitcoin or how Bitcoin studies the market. Therefore, for Bitcoin, predicting the trend of Bitcoin price can effectively help Bitcoin investors. Data from www. Coingecko, the price of bitcoin is sorted according to the time sequence. Using the time series model, the change of bitcoin price in a specific period which is from 28 April 2013 to 22 August 2022 is calculated to predict the future trend of bitcoin price. Data preprocessing includes attributes removal, stationary test, and differencing. In predicting the price of Bitcoin, the ARIMA method that can produce high accuracy in short-term prediction is adopted. Use prediction test AIC and Check the residuals to select the best prediction model among the candidate models. The results of model testing show that AIC of ARIMA (5,1,2) is the smallest among all candidate models, and the results of residual check also show that ARIMA (5,1,2) model is the best model for predicting four periods.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".