Antecedents of mobile banking app adoption during COVID19: A perspective of Jordanian consumer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The effect of contextual factors namely information quality, service quality, system quality, Technological readiness, trust in applications (app) and COVID-19 health anxiety, on the intention and consequently the actual use of Mobile Payment (MP) app was examined in this study. Trust, as mediator to the relationship between technological readiness and intention to use MB-app was examined also. Data were obtained from 740 Jordanian Mobile Banking (MB) app users through an online survey. The relationship between service quality, system quality, information quality, trust in the app, COVID-19 health anxiety, Technological readiness and the intentions to use MB-app and the actual use of MB-app was empirically examined. The results showed a positive relationship between service quality, system quality, information quality, trust in the app and COVID-19 health anxiety, and the intentions to use MB-app, and in turn he actual use of MB-app, and a positive mediation of trust on the relationship between COVID-19 health anxiety and the intentions to use MB-app.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".