The role of social media, service quality and public relation on organization image
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A good Organizational Image is already known as the important factor in developing higher education organization. This research investigated the effect of marketing variables, namely Service Quality, Social Media and Public Relation, toward the Organizational Image. This research was conducted at private universities located in South Tangerang City, Indonesia. The sample of this research were 715 students taken in proportional random sampling from 8 private universities. The method of data collecting from each variable used the questionnaires, and data analysis used the Path Analysis Technique which was calculated by Smart PLS-SEM program. The research findings derived conclusions that (1) Service Quality, Social Media and Public Relation have significant effect on Organizational Image, and (2) The Social Media and Service Quality have significant effect on Public Relation. Based on those findings we recommend that improving the Organizational Image should be prioritized through strengthening the Service Quality, Social Media and Public Relation activities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it