MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4311815306 · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-2341806/v1

Antibiotic elution from cement: an in vitro study

2022· preprint· en· W4311815306 on OpenAlexaff
Christy Graff, Bradley Crick, Rebecca Tang

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Square · 2022
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOrthopedic Infections and Treatments
Canadian institutionsRoyal Ottawa Mental Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElutionCementVancomycinAntibioticsSalineBone cementMaterials scienceBiomedical engineeringComplicationMedicineChromatographySurgeryComposite materialMicrobiologyChemistryAnesthesiaStaphylococcus aureusBacteriaBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Prosthetic joint infection is a serious complication of total hip replacement. Cement removal during two stage revisions can be associated with significant morbidity. Exposing new surface area of cement may achieve therapeutic antibiotic elution. Methods Five blocks containing polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) and vancomycin were stored in normal saline at 37C and allowed to reach steady state. Different interventions to expose new surface area were performed at six weeks. Results Post intervention, blocks with the greatest increase in surface area showed the greatest increase in vancomycin levels, the highest increase being 641.77% compared with the control (5.88%). Conclusions This study confirms antibiotics remain trapped within PMMA after elution ceases. Further release of vancomycin from cement occurs after exposing new surface area. This seems proportional to the exposed surface area size.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.096
GPT teacher head0.451
Teacher spread0.355 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch SquareSame topicOrthopedic Infections and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207