Isolated Internuclear Ophthalmoplegia as an Embolic Complication of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An 83-year-old male developed horizontal diplopia immediately following elective transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). On right gaze, left eye adduction was impaired while there was horizontal nystagmus of the abducting right eye, representative of internuclear ophthalmoplegia (INO). The remainder of the neurological examination was normal. Computer tomography (CT) imaging of the brain and CT angiogram of the head and neck were normal. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain showed five small foci of restricted diffusion affecting both the anterior and posterior circulation bilaterally. One such tiny infarct was seen in the left parasagittal upper pontine tegmentum and was attributed to his presentation. While all symptoms rapidly improved, minimal residual signs of INO were still detectable at the six-month follow-up. Isolated intra-nuclear ophthalmoplegia is a rare stroke syndrome and an unusual cardio-embolic complication of minimally invasive cardiac procedures. TAVI is an increasingly popular technique, although has been associated with a higher incidence of micro-embolic cerebrovascular events evident on MRI than surgical repairs. While the use of embolic protection devices has high-quality evidence in reducing the burden of these usually silent cerebrovascular events, their role in preventing long-term neurocognitive sequala has not been demonstrated.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".