Multimodal measures of spontaneous brain activity reveals both common and divergent patterns of cortical functional organization
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Work in humans and animals shows that the brain can be decomposed into large-scale functional networks. Whereas most studies, especially in humans, use the blood-oxygenation-level-dependent (BOLD) signal, the relationship between BOLD and neuronal activity is complex and incompletely understood. This limits our ability to interpret and apply measures derived from fMRI-BOLD. Here, we employ wide-field Ca 2+ imaging simultaneously recorded with fMRI-BOLD in highly-sampled mice expressing GCaMP6f in excitatory neurons. These unique data enabled us to characterize the similarities and differences between networks discoverable by each modality. Importantly, we applied a network partitioning approach that uses a mixed-membership algorithm, which allows brain regions to participate in multiple networks with varying strengths. This contrasts with assuming regions belong to only one network. Our findings demonstrate that (1) most BOLD networks are detected via Ca 2+ signals. (2) There is considerable overlapping—as opposed to disjoint—network organization that is evident from both modalities. (3) Large-scale networks determined by Ca 2+ signals at low temporal frequencies (0.01 – 0.5 Hz )—as opposed to higher frequencies (0.5 – 5 Hz )—are more similar to those determined by BOLD. (4) Despite many similarities, differences emerge across modes including the spatial distribution of membership diversity (the extent to which regions affiliate with multiple networks). In sum, Ca 2+ imaging of excitatory neurons confirms that the mouse cortex is functionally organized into overlapping large-scale networks in a manner that reflects many, but not all, properties observable with simultaneous fMRI-BOLD; affirming the neural origins of patterns of brain organization that are evident in a clinically accessible neuroimaging modality.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".