SPD matrices representing artery anatomy for first-pass effect prediction by aggregated networks with multi-scale attentions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
First-pass Effect(FPE) for Endovascular Therapy(EVT) is associated with good clinical outcome (mRS2) of patients with Acute Ischaemic Stroke (AIS). A rapid and accurate prediction of FPE before EVT can help neurointerventionists plan the procedure and avoid delays in restoration of cerebral blood flow. However, there are rare studies focused on FPE prediction on arterial vessel anatomy immediately. The intractable difficulty lies in extracting discriminative features to represent a wide variety of vessels with irregular vessel shapes. In this paper, we propose a Symmetric Positive Definite(SPD) matrix-based feature representation extracted from the centerline of arterial vessels, encoding the global discriminative information over the artery for predicting FPE. Subsequently, a collaborative network of multi-scale Convolutional Neural Network(CNN) and Multiple Layer Perception (MLP) with specific attentions is developed. Specifically, the CNN is used for capturing the features among the multi-scale local neighbours of the curve. MLPs are used for capturing more prominent global discriminative features at different scales. The attention mechanism is used to better filter and extract the useful information for feature fusion. Quantitative experimental results demonstrate that our proposed method is able to predict FPE accurately, outperforming the manually defined features and traditional machine learning-based methods in this task, regarding the metrics of AUC, precision, sensitivity, specificity and accuracy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".