MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4311867136 · doi:10.3892/ol.2022.13625

Prognostic value of CD8<sup>+</sup> tumor‑infiltrating T cells in patients with breast cancer: A systematic review and meta‑analysis

2022· review· en· W4311867136 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueOncology Letters · 2022
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBreast cancerMedicineHazard ratioInternal medicineEstrogen receptorOncologyTumor-infiltrating lymphocytesCD8Cochrane LibraryCancerOdds ratioMeta-analysisConfidence intervalImmunologyImmune systemImmunotherapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

CD8<sup>+</sup> tumor‑infiltrating lymphocytes have been regarded as potential biomarkers for cancer prognosis, while the prognostic effect of CD8<sup>+</sup> tumor‑infiltrating T cells remains controversial in breast cancer. In the present study, a meta‑analysis was performed to evaluate the prognostic value of CD8<sup><sub>+</sub></sup> T cells in breast cancer and the associations between CD8<sup>+</sup> T cells and the pathological characteristics. The PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched entries added from the establishment of the database to November 2021 and prospective or retrospective studies of patients with breast cancer were included. The Newcastle‑Ottawa Scale was used to assess the quality of evidence for each study. STATA 15.1 was used for the data analysis. A total of 14 studies comprising 22,222 patients were included in the final analysis and the pooled results suggested that a high CD8<sup>+</sup> T‑cell infiltration level was significantly related to better overall survival [hazard ratio (HR)=0.70, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.60‑0.82, P&lt;0.001] and disease‑free survival (HR=0.63, 95% CI: 0.49‑0.81, P&lt;0.001) for patients with breast cancer. In addition, a high CD8<sup>+</sup> T‑cell infiltration level was significantly associated with decreased expression of estrogen receptor [odds ratio (OR)=1.92, 95% CI: 1.30‑2.85, P=0.001] and progesterone receptor (OR=1.66, 95% CI: 1.14‑2.42, P=0.008), and increased human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 expression (OR=0.79, 95% CI: 0.66‑0.94, P=0.010) in patients with breast cancer, while there was no significant association between CD8<sup>+</sup> T‑cell infiltration and age, tumor size or lymph node status of patients with breast cancer (P&gt;0.05). In conclusion, CD8<sup>+</sup> T‑cell infiltration is of prognostic value in patients with breast cancer. High levels of CD8<sup>+</sup> T‑cell infiltration were related to improved prognosis, including OS and DFS, in patients with breast cancer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.812
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0090.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it