LOW-COST DEPTH-CAMERA: OPEN-SOURCE 3D DISPLACEMENT MEASUREMENTS FOR 4D PRINTED HYGROSCOPIC COMPOSITES
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract. 4D printing (4DP) is a growing branch of 3D printing technology that involves the design of composite material architectures capable of shape-change transformations, which occur post printing, in response to external stimulus. Among these, Wood Polymer Composites (WPCs) change their shape in reaction to changes of moisture content, shrinking or swelling like natural wood until the equilibrium with the environment is reached. Such intrinsic material behavior can be particularly useful in the development of passive moisture airflow controllers that can modulate humidity and airflow in indoor environments to improve air quality. Precise measurement of the time-based stimulus induced shape-change response of these composites is critical to assess the responsiveness, velocity of reaction and overall deformation of the designed 4DP composite mechanisms. Up until now, Digital Image Correlation (DIC) techniques have been widely used for such purpose. However, DIC methods require expensive equipment and costly commercial software. This paper presents a Low-Cost Depth-Camera (LCDC) method that uses a free custom algorithm that returns a 3D coloured displacement map with the corresponding meshes of the acquired object. The LCDC method does not require specialized equipment and allows for an overall understanding of the time-dependent deformation of 4DP actuators, this method also facilitates the comparison between composites with different properties under the same external conditions. This new LCDC method has the potential to further 4DP research by providing an open-source, accessible and reliable tool to assess 3D displacement measurements.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".