MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4311892063 · doi:10.1101/2022.12.05.519200

HLA-Glyco: A large-scale interrogation of the glycosylated immunopeptidome

2022· preprint· en· W4311892063 on OpenAlexaff
Georges Bedran, Daniel A. Polasky, Yi Hsiao, Fengchao Yu, Felipe da Veiga Leprevost, Javier A. Alfaro, Marcin Cieślik, Alexey I. Nesvizhskii

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2022
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Topicvaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersEuropean Regional Development FundNational Institutes of HealthFundacja na rzecz Nauki PolskiejEuropean Commission
KeywordsGlycanHuman leukocyte antigenGlycopeptideGlycosylationComputational biologyWorkflowFalse discovery rateBiologyComputer scienceImmunologyGeneticsAntigenGlycoproteinDatabaseGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract MHC-associated peptides (MAPs) bearing post-translational modifications (PTMs) have raised intriguing questions regarding their attractiveness for targeted therapies. Here, we developed a novel computational glyco-immunopeptidomics workflow that integrates the ultrafast glycopeptide search of MSFragger with a glycopeptide-focused false discovery rate (FDR) control. We performed a harmonized analysis of 8 large-scale publicly available studies and found that glycosylated MAPs are predominantly presented by the MHC class II. We created HLA-Glyco, a resource containing over 3,400 human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class II N-glycopeptides from 1,049 distinct protein glycosylation sites. Our comprehensive resource reveals high levels of truncated glycans, conserved HLA-binding cores, and differences in glycosylation positional specificity between classical HLA class II allele groups. To support the nascent field of glyco-immunopeptidomics, we include the optimized workflow in the FragPipe suite and provide HLA-Glyco as a free web resource.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.097
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicvaccines and immunoinformatics approachesFrench-language works237,207