MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4311908417 · doi:10.1016/j.cct.2022.107056

Randomized controlled trial of the ehavioral ntervention for increasing hysical ctivity in ultiple clerosis project: Secondary, patient-reported outcomes

2022· article· en· W4311908417 on OpenAlexaff
Robert W. Motl, Brian M. Sandroff, Lara A. Pilutti, Gary Cutter, Roberto G. Aldunate, Ariel Kidwell-Chandler, Rachel E. Bollaert

Bibliographic record

VenueContemporary Clinical Trials · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMultiple Sclerosis Research Studies
Canadian institutionsCanada Foundation for InnovationUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNational Multiple Sclerosis Society
KeywordsRandomized controlled trialMedicineAnxietyIntervention (counseling)Quality of life (healthcare)Physical therapyHospital Anxiety and Depression ScaleCognitive behavioral therapyDepression (economics)Clinical trialClinical psychologyPsychiatryInternal medicineNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.071
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.197
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesMetaresearch
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.126
Threshold uncertainty score0.957

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0710.197
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0080.006
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.438
GPT teacher head0.515
Teacher spread0.077 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueContemporary Clinical TrialsSame topicMultiple Sclerosis Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207