Large extent of mercury stable isotope fractionation in contaminated stream sediments induced by changes of mercury binding forms
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mercury (Hg) release from contaminated legacy sites is a large contributor to riverine ecosystems and can represent a significant local and regional environmental issue even long after the initial site contamination. Understanding processes of in-stream species transformation is therefore important to assess the fate and bioavailability of the released Hg. In this study, we investigated in-stream Hg transformation processes with analyses of Hg binding forms and Hg stable isotopes. Stream sediments were collected downstream of a former kyanization facility (Black Forest, SW Germany), where highly soluble Hg(II)-chloride (HgCl 2 ) was used as an anti-fouling agent to treat timber. Exfiltration of partly anoxic, contaminated groundwater with Hg concentrations of up to 700 μg L −1 into the adjacent Gutach stream is the main source of Hg to sediments. Total Hg concentrations in the stream bottom sediments (<2 mm) ranged from background values of 6.3 µg kg −1 upstream of the contaminated site to 77 mg kg −1 near the location of exfiltration of contaminated groundwater. A five-step sequential extraction procedure and Hg pyrolytic thermal desorption (PTD) analyses indicated changes in Hg binding forms in the sediments along the flow path towards a higher proportion of organically bound Hg. A large shift towards negative δ 202 Hg values was observed downstream of the contaminated site (change of ≈2‰) along with a minor offset in mass-independent fractionation. Binary mixing models based on Hg isotope ratios using one industrial and different natural background endmembers were tested to estimate their respective contribution of Hg to the sediments but failed to produce plausible allocations. Based on the observed changes in isotopic composition, total Hg concentrations and Hg binding forms, we propose that the large extent of fractionation observed in downstream sediments is the result of a combination of kinetic isotope effects during sorption, redistribution of Hg within the sediment and the preferential transport of Hg associated with the sediment fine fraction. These results highlight the importance of transformation processes when assessing the sources and fate of Hg in environmental systems and show limitations of using simple mixing models based on Hg stable isotopes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".