MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4311960214 · doi:10.17222/mit.2022.636

NUMERICAL INVESTIGATION OF HVAF-SPRAYED Fe-BASED AMORPHOUS COATINGS

2022· article· en· W4311960214 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Nianchu Wu, Tingting Li, Jingbao Lian

Bibliographic record

VenueMateriali in tehnologije · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHigh-Temperature Coating Behaviors
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Liaoning Province
KeywordsNozzleMaterials scienceMechanicsParticle (ecology)Dwell timeComposite materialThermodynamicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A numerical analysis was performed to predict the effect of the convergent section geometry of a gun nozzle on the high-velocity air-fuel (HVAF) thermal spray Fe-based amorphous coating (AC) process. A computational fluid dynamics model was applied to investigate the gas-flow field and the behavior of in-flight particles at nozzle entrance convergent section length ranging from 28 mm to 56.8 mm and different shapes of the Laval nozzle convergent section (a straight line and Vitosinski convergence curve). On the one hand, the change in the gas-flame flow characteristics for the Vitosinski curve shows a uniform and stable flame compared with the straight-line curve in the convergent section. The straight-line curve shape of the Laval nozzle convergent section has a higher particle temperature compared with the Vitosinski-curve shape of the Laval nozzle convergent section. The particle dwell time for the straight-line curve shape of the Laval nozzle convergent section is longer than that for the Vitosinski curve shape of the Laval nozzle convergent section. On the other hand, the nozzle entrance convergent section length obviously affects the particle temperature, and the particle dwell time increases with the increasing nozzle entrance convergent section length. By analyzing both the melt status of the particles and particle velocity, the optimal gun configuration (0.7 V) producing low-porosity coatings was predicted. These calculations were experimentally verified by producing a low-porosity (1.37 %) Fe-based AC, fabricated with HVAF using the predicted optimal gun configuration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score0.791

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMateriali in tehnologijeSame topicHigh-Temperature Coating BehaviorsFrench-language works237,207