MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4311976393 · doi:10.21825/vdt.85519

Accidentele monensin-intoxicatie bij een hond

2022· article· nl· W4311976393 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
H. De Bosschere, E. Kindermans

Bibliographic record

VenueVlaams Diergeneeskundig Tijdschrift · 2022
Typearticle
Languagenl
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicCoccidia and coccidiosis research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMonensinMedicineBiologyAnimal science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Een vijftien maanden oude, mannelijke, gecastreerde labrador retriever werd aangeboden met uitgesproken apathie, bruinrood verkleurde urine, polyurie en polydipsie. Differentiaaldiagnostisch werd initieel aan leptospirose, intoxicatie en acuut nierfalen gedacht. Uit het bloed- en urineonderzoek kon een zeer erge spierbeschadiging afgeleid worden. De eigenaars hadden de hond zien kauwen op een pensbolus met monensin. Monensin-intoxicatie uit zich onder andere in erge myopathie. Dit is een casusbeschrijving van een accidentele monensin-intoxicatie.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.524
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0510.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVlaams Diergeneeskundig TijdschriftSame topicCoccidia and coccidiosis researchFrench-language works237,207