MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4311979030 · doi:10.1136/jnnp-2022-bnpa.31

31 Disorganization of language and working memory networks in frontal versus temporal lobe epilepsy

2022· article· en· W4311979030 on OpenAlexaff
Lorenzo Caciagli, Casey Paquola, Xiaosong He, Christian Vollmar, María Centeno, Britta Wandschneider, Urs Braun, Karin Trimmel, Sjoerd B. Vos, Meneka K. Sidhu, Pamela J. Thompson, Sallie Baxendale, Gavin P. Winston, John S. Duncan, Dani S. Bassett, Matthias J. Koepp, Boris C. Bernhardt

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies
Canadian institutionsQueen's UniversityMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWorking memoryEpilepsyEpisodic memoryFunctional magnetic resonance imagingCognitionTemporal lobeCognitive psychologyFrontal lobePsychologyExecutive functionsNeuropsychologyNeuroscienceAudiologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objectives/Aims Cognitive impairment is a common comorbidity of epilepsy, and can be more burdensome than seizures themselves. Temporal and frontal lobe epilepsy (TLE, FLE) are accompanied by multi-domain cognitive impairment. While the underlying neural substrates have been extensively investigated in TLE, functional imaging studies in FLE are scarce. Here, we aimed to: (i) investigate systems-level neural processes accounting for cognitive dysfunction in FLE; (ii) directly compare FLE and TLE patients, establishing commonalities and differences; and (iii) decode the potential influence of clinical characteristics on cognitive network architecture. Methods We capitalized on a large, single-centre sample of 172 adult participants (56 with FLE, 64 with TLE, 52 with controls) who were investigated via: (i) an extensive neuropsychological test battery that included attention, psychomotor speed, language, working memory, executive function, and episodic memory tests; and (ii) four functional MRI tasks probing expressive language (verbal fluency, verb generation) and working memory (verbal and visuo-spatial). Patient groups were comparable in age of epilepsy onset, disease duration, and antiseizure medication load. We mapped task-related brain activation and deactivation using a novel multiscale approach, and tracked reorganization in FLE and TLE. We complemented voxel-based maps with profiling of task effects across established motifs of functional brain organization: (i) canonical resting-state functional networks, and (ii) the principal functional connectivity gradient, that encodes a continuous transition from lower-level (sensory) to higher-order (transmodal) brain areas. Results We find that cognitive impairment in FLE is accompanied by broadly reduced activation across frontoparietal attentional and executive networks, and reduced default-mode network deactivation, indicating large-scale disorganization of task-related recruitment, particularly during working memory. Patterns of dysfunction in FLE and TLE are broadly similar, but some traits are syndrome-specific: impaired task-related deactivation of the default-mode network is more prominent in FLE, while impaired recruitment of posterior language areas is more marked in TLE. More severe epilepsy, as tracked by age at onset, epilepsy duration, seizure frequency, time since last seizure, and propensity for focal-to-bilateral tonic-clonic seizures, relates to more marked cognitive network disorganization both in FLE and TLE. Conclusions Our study elucidates neural processes underlying cognitive impairment in the most common focal epilepsies, identifies frontoparietal executive alterations as a shared biological signature, irrespective of seizure focus localization, and shows that temporal lobe language alterations are TLE-specific. The highlighted systems-level behaviour may be amenable to future remediation strategies, including neurostimulation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Neurology Neurosurgery & PsychiatrySame topicFunctional Brain Connectivity StudiesFrench-language works237,207