MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4312006325 · doi:10.52953/zpdb8065

SFCaaS: Service function chains as a service in NFV environments

2022· article· en· W4312006325 on OpenAlexaff
Tarik Moufakir, Mohamed Faten Zhani, Abdelouahed Gherbi, Moayad Aloqaily, Nadir Ghrada

Bibliographic record

VenueITU Journal on Future and Evolving Technologies · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5G
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceService (business)ProvisioningHeuristicOrchestrationFunction (biology)Resource allocationResource (disambiguation)Network Functions VirtualizationDistributed computingOperations researchService providerSoftware deploymentVirtual networkComputer networkCloud computingSoftware engineeringBusinessArtificial intelligenceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the growing deployment of emergent technologies like software-defined networking, network services are expected to be revolutionized. In this paper, we investigate offering Service Function Chains as a Service (SFCaaS) in NFV environments. We describe the potential business model to offer such a service and then we address the service function chain provisioning and resource allocation problem. As the chain is deployed thanks to virtual machines (i.e., instances) and links, we conduct first a detailed study of the costs of Amazon EC2 instances with respect to their location, size, type and performance. Afterwards, we address the resource allocation problem for service function chains from the SFC provider's perspective. We formulate the problem as an integer linear program aiming at reducing operational costs of the service function chains (i.e., costs of virtual machine instances and links, and synchronization among the instances). To address large-scale instances of the problem, we also propose a new heuristic algorithm to reduce operational costs taking into account the conducted study of the costs of Amazon EC2 instances. We show through extensive simulations that the proposed heuristic significantly reduces operational costs compared to a baseline algorithm inspired by the existing literature.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.832
Threshold uncertainty score0.660

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueITU Journal on Future and Evolving TechnologiesSame topicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5GFrench-language works237,207