Integrative chromatin domain annotation through graph embedding of Hi-C data
Bibliographic record
Abstract
MOTIVATION: The organization of the genome into domains plays a central role in gene expression and other cellular activities. Researchers identify genomic domains mainly through two views: 1D functional assays such as ChIP-seq, and chromatin conformation assays such as Hi-C. Fully understanding domains requires integrative modeling that combines these two views. However, the predominant form of integrative modeling uses segmentation and genome annotation (SAGA) along with the rigid assumption that loci in contact are more likely to share the same domain type, which is not necessarily true for epigenomic domain types and genome-wide chromatin interactions. RESULTS: Here, we present an integrative approach that annotates domains using both 1D functional genomic signals and Hi-C measurements of genome-wide 3D interactions without the use of a pairwise prior. We do so by using a graph embedding to learn structural features corresponding to each genomic region, then inputting learned structural features along with functional genomic signals to a SAGA algorithm. We show that our domain types recapitulate well-known subcompartments with an additional granularity that distinguishes a combination of the spatial and functional states of the genomic regions. In particular, we identified a division of the previously identified A2 subcompartment such that the divided domain types have significantly varying expression levels. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: https://github.com/nedashokraneh/IChDA. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".