MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4312020029 · doi:10.1039/d2ay01670b

Fractionation and online mass spectrometry based on imaged capillary isoelectric focusing (icIEF) for characterizing charge heterogeneity of therapeutic antibody

2022· article· en· W4312020029 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAnalytical Methods · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicProtein purification and stability
Canadian institutionsAdvanced Electrophoresis Solutions (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIsoelectric focusingChemistryChromatographyFractionationMass spectrometryAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Tandem mass spectrometryIsoelectric pointCapillary electrophoresisCapillary electrophoresis–mass spectrometryCapillary actionElectrospray ionizationMaterials scienceBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Imaged capillary isoelectric focusing (icIEF) technology has been proved to be robust for the characterization of protein charge heterogeneity due to its high-resolution pI discrimination and high-throughput. Although high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) tandem mass spectrometry (MS) and offline fraction collection technologies including isoelectric focusing (IEF), ion exchange chromatography (IEX) and free flow electrophoresis (FFE) have been widely utilized for protein charge variant characterization, there are a few applications of MS coupling with icIEF as a front-separation technique and related fractionation technologies for protein charge heterogeneity. However, the application of icIEF-MS has been much less frequent due to difficulties in MS interface, compatible ampholyte and coated capillary cartridge designation, ultimately impeding the breadth of icIEF applications in protein charge heterogeneity. In this study, a therapeutic monoclonal antibody (mAb-M-AT) was used for its charge variant characterization on an integrated icIEF platform with functions including analytical profiling, MS online coupling and fraction collection for charge heterogeneities. The main protein component and its four charge variants were identified using direct icIEF-MS coupling. Additionally, the two major acidic and basic charge variants were collected using preparative fractionation after the protein focused in the separation capillary. The identity of the fractions was confirmed by LC-MS at intact protein level and the results were consistent with those using icIEF-MS online coupling. The multiple operation modes of the icIEF platform described above can be rapidly and flexibly switched just by changing customized capillary separation cartridges without drastically altering instrument configuration. The whole workflow of icIEF-based profiling, fractionation and MS online coupling for protein heterogeneity is straightforward, reliable, and accurate, thus providing comprehensive solutions for in-depth protein heterogeneity characterization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.453
Threshold uncertainty score0.446

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.393
Teacher spread0.354 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it