MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4312044467 · doi:10.1103/physrevb.106.245132

Fermi arcs from dynamical variational Monte Carlo

2022· article· en· W4312044467 on OpenAlexafffund
Peter Rosenberg, David Sénéchal, A.–M. S. Tremblay, M. Charlebois

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. B./Physical review. B · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPhysics of Superconductivity and Magnetism
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Trois-RivièresUniversité de Sherbrooke
FundersCanada First Research Excellence Fund
KeywordsPseudogapPhysicsVariational Monte CarloQuantum Monte CarloHubbard modelSuperconductivityFermi Gamma-ray Space TelescopeMonte Carlo methodStatistical physicsMott insulatorCluster (spacecraft)Quantum mechanicsFermi surfaceCondensed matter physicsCuprateComputer scienceMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Variational Monte Carlo is a many-body numerical method that scales well with system size. It has been extended to study the Green function only recently by Charlebois and Imada [Phys. Rev. X 10, 041023 (2020)]. Here we generalize the approach to systems with open boundary conditions in the absence of translational invariance. Removing these constraints permits the application of embedding techniques like cluster perturbation theory (CPT). Using this approach we provide robust evidence of the existence of Fermi arcs in the one-band Hubbard model, an enduring problem in the physics of the pseudogap in cuprate high-temperature superconductors. We study the behavior of the Fermi surface and of the density of states as a function of hole doping for clusters of up to 64 sites, well beyond the reach of modern exact diagonalization solvers. We observe that the technique reliably captures the transition from a Mott insulator at half filling to a pseudogap, evidenced by the formation of Fermi arcs, and finally to a metallic state at large doping. The ability to treat large clusters with quantum cluster methods helps to minimize potential finite-size effects and enables the study of systems with long-range orders, which will help extend the reach of these already powerful methods and provide important insights on the nature of various strongly correlated many-electron systems, including the high-${\mathrm{T}}_{c}$ cuprate superconductors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.105
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. B./Physical review. BSame topicPhysics of Superconductivity and MagnetismFrench-language works237,207