MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4312058795 · doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.12.021

Proton Therapy in Canada: Toward Universal Access and Health Equity With a Publicly Funded Facility

2022· article· en· W4312058795 on OpenAlexaffabout
Amir H. Safavi, Carolyn Freeman, Sylvia Cheng, Samir Patel, Gunita Mitera, Vijayananda Kundapur, Rob Rutledge, Derek S. Tsang

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRadiation Therapy and Dosimetry
Canadian institutionsSaskatchewan Cancer AgencyUniversity of SaskatchewanUniversity of AlbertaMcGill University Health CentrePrincess Margaret Cancer CentreDalhousie UniversityBC Children's HospitalUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineEquity (law)Health equityProton therapyFamily medicineNursingInternal medicinePublic healthLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Proton beam therapy (PBT) is a form of external beam radiation therapy that provides dosimetric and clinical advantages over photon therapy for treating some children and adults with benign or malignant tumors.1 The physical properties of proton beam distribution allow for both delivery of the prescribed dose at the end of the beam range within the tumor target as well as near-zero exit dose, thereby reducing the volume of irradiated normal tissues. Clinical evidence indicates that PBT is at least as isoeffective in tumor control as photon radiation therapy, but with potential reduction in long-term toxicities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.902
Threshold uncertainty score0.712

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0050.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0030.005
Research integrity0.0040.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.379
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*PhysicsSame topicRadiation Therapy and DosimetryFrench-language works237,207