Jarvis R. Givens, Fugitive Pedagogy: Carter G. Woodson and the Art of Black Teaching
Bibliographic record
Abstract
education on the continent in general, and to move away from the exceptionalism that has tended to dominate educational history here" (13).The book is exceptional in its efforts at situating South Africa's colonial education history within the wide-ranging themes of domination, exploitation, oppression, and control, which characterizes the history of colonial education across other colonized parts of Africa.Another distinctive aspect of the book is the idiosyncratic lens through which the actions of individuals and numerous non-state actors are magnified and explored for their various roles in strategic historical events and outcomes.Peter Kallaway's The Changing Face of Colonial Education in Africa: Education, Science, and Development is an effort at forging an alliance between the South African educational history as well as the broader history of education across colonial Africa.Despite the differences in the education history of all colonizing powers and colonies, the common thread that runs through all is that it was a system that was founded on inequity, exploitation, oppression, and injustice.The work also focuses on both state and non-state actors including individuals in seeking to unearth the reality and relationship amongst policy formulation, implementation, and outcome.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".