MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4312066353 · doi:10.1113/jp283979

Acute hypoxia elicits lasting reductions in the sympathetic action potential transduction of arterial blood pressure in males

2022· article· en· W4312066353 on OpenAlexafffund
Brooke M. Shafer, Massimo Nardone, Anthony V. Incognito, Tyler D. Vermeulen, André L. Teixeira, Philip J. Millar, A. William Sheel, Chris West, Najib Ayas, Glen E. Foster

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physiology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Canadian institutionsOkanagan University CollegeInternational Collaboration On Repair DiscoveriesUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of GuelphInterior HealthKelowna General HospitalUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaHeart and Stroke Foundation of Canada
KeywordsHypoxia (environmental)MicroneurographyBlood pressureMean arterial pressureInternal medicineMedicineCardiologyAnesthesiaEndocrinologyHeart rateBaroreflexChemistryOxygen

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Post‐hypoxia sympathoexcitation does not elicit corresponding changes in vascular tone, suggesting diminished sympathetic signalling. Blunted sympathetic transduction following acute hypoxia, however, has not been confirmed and the effects of hypoxia on the sympathetic transduction of mean arterial pressure (MAP) as a function of action potential (AP) activity is unknown. We hypothesized that MAP changes would be blunted during acute hypoxia but restored in recovery and asynchronous APs would elicit smaller MAP changes than synchronous APs. Seven healthy males (age: 24 (3) years; BMI: 25 (3) kg/m 2 ) underwent 20 min isocapnic hypoxia (P ET O 2 : 47 (2) mmHg) and 30 min recovery. Multi‐unit microneurography (muscle sympathetic nerve activity; MSNA) and continuous wavelet transform with matched mother wavelet was used to detect sympathetic APs during baseline, hypoxia, early (first 7 min) and late (last 7 min) recovery. AP groups were classified as synchronous APs, asynchronous APs (occurring outside an MSNA burst) and no AP activity. Sympathetic transduction of MAP was quantified using signal‐averaging, with ΔMAP tracked following AP group cardiac cycles. Following synchronous APs, ΔMAP was reduced in hypoxia (+1.8 (0.9) mmHg) and early recovery (+1.5 (0.7) mmHg) compared with baseline (+3.1 (2.2) mmHg). AP group‐by‐condition interactions show that at rest asynchronous APs attenuate MAP reductions compared with no AP activity (−0.4 (1.1) vs . −2.2 (1.2) mmHg, respectively), with no difference between AP groups in hypoxia, early or late recovery. Sympathetic transduction of MAP is blunted in hypoxia and early recovery. At rest, asynchronous sympathetic APs contribute to neural regulation of MAP by attenuating nadir pressure responses. image Key points Acute isocapnic hypoxia elicits lasting sympathoexcitation that does not correspond to parallel changes in vascular tone, suggesting blunted sympathetic transduction. Signal‐averaging techniques track the magnitude and temporal cardiovascular responses following integrated muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) burst and non‐burst cardiac cycles. However, this does not fully characterize the effects of sympathetic action potential (AP) activity on blood pressure control. We show that hypoxia blunts the sympathetic transduction of mean arterial pressure (MAP) following synchronous APs that form integrated MSNA bursts and that sympathetic transduction of MAP remains attenuated into early recovery. At rest, asynchronous APs attenuate the reduction in MAP compared with cardiac cycles following no AP activity, thus asynchronous sympathetic APs appear to contribute to the neural regulation of blood pressure. The results advance our understanding of sympathetic transduction of arterial pressure during and following exposure to acute isocapnic hypoxia in humans.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.787
Threshold uncertainty score0.202

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of PhysiologySame topicHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlFrench-language works237,207