Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les moyens d’action souvent privilégiés pour la sauvegarde de la planète comme la sanctuarisation de zones protégées et la gestion de la production/consommation paraissent aujourd’hui insuffisants pour endiguer la dégradation de notre environnement. Nous proposons dans cette contribution une double réflexion qui vise (1) à alimenter le débat sur le rapport de l’Homme à la Nature et (2) à montrer comment l’art contemporain peut contribuer à sensibiliser le public et à le mobiliser pour une prise en charge élargie et critique de la problématique environnementale. Après avoir remis en question la vision occidentale traditionnelle du duo Nature/Culture, nous rappellerons comment l’art contemporain s’est tourné vers des problématiques sociétales, donnant naissance à l’art écologique. Nous montrerons ensuite comment celui-ci peut être arrimé à l’éducation relative à l’environnement (ERE) et ce, à partir d’exemples extraits de la plateforme Arts&Ere qui offre des ressources pédagogiques en ERE à partir des arts.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.027 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.013 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".