MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4312078421 · doi:10.3917/ris.128.0017

Le sommet de l’Organisation de coopération de Shanghai à Samarcande, ou les conséquences de l’invasion de l’Ukraine sur l’Asie centrale

2022· article· fr· W4312078421 on OpenAlexaff
Olga Alexeeva, Frédèric Lasserre

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue internationale et stratégique · 2022
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicChina's Global Influence and Migration
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dans un contexte de guerre en Ukraine, le 22 e sommet de l’Organisation de coopération de Shanghai (OCS) s’est tenu en septembre 2022 à Samarcande. À la faveur de cette rencontre sont apparus des signes de prise de distance de la Chine et des républiques d’Asie centrale vis-à-vis de la Russie, tandis que d’autres partenaires, Inde, Iran et Turquie notamment, se sont efforcés de profiter de ce qui ressemble à une perte d’influence de Moscou dans la région. Quelles sont les causes de cette dynamique ? Cet article analyse les discours des participants et les communiqués officiels publiés à l’issue des différentes rencontres ainsi que la couverture médiatique de cet événement.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.583
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue internationale et stratégiqueSame topicChina's Global Influence and MigrationFrench-language works237,207