MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4312088318 · doi:10.1002/alz.059759

Clinical outcomes of older persons and persons with dementia admitted for COVID‐19: findings from the Philippine CORONA Study

2022· article· en· W4312088318 on OpenAlexaff
Veeda Michelle M. Anlacan, Bernadeth Lyn C. Piamonte, Marie Charmaine C. Sy, Roland Dominic G. Jamora

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLong-Term Effects of COVID-19
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoSt. Michael's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineIntensive care unitHazard ratioDementiaCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Retrospective cohort studyCohort studyRespiratory failureCohortPediatricsInternal medicineEmergency medicineDiseaseConfidence intervalInfectious disease (medical specialty)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic substantially threatens the health of all populations worldwide, but even more so of vulnerable groups. In our subanalysis of The Philippine CORONA Study, we aimed to determine the impact of older age and dementia on clinically relevant outcomes in COVID‐19 patients. Method We included data that were collected in The Philippine CORONA Study, a multicenter, comparative, retrospective, cohort study of 10,881 adult COVID‐19 patients who were admitted between February 2020 and December 2020. Clinical outcomes analyzed were mortality, respiratory failure, duration of ventilator dependence (DVD), intensive care unit (ICU) admission, length of ICU stay (LICUS), and length of hospital stay (LHS) among older persons (individuals ≥ 60 years old) and persons with dementia admitted for COVID‐19 infection. Result The adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) for mortality among the mild and severe cases were significantly higher by 3.93, 95% CI [2.81, 5.50] and by 1.81, 95% CI [1.43, 2.93], respectively, in older patients compared to younger adults. The aHRs for respiratory failure in the elderly were significantly increased by 2.65, 95% CI [1.92, 3.68] and by 1.27, 95% CI [1.01, 1.59] among the mild and severe cases, respectively. The aHR for ICU admission in the older group was significantly higher by 1.95, 95% CI [1.47, 2.59] among the mild cases. Older COVID‐19 patients had significantly shorter median DVD and LHS than younger patients. The aHRs for mortality and ICU admission in persons with dementia were significantly higher by 7.25, 95% CI [2.67, 19.68] and by 4.37, 95% CI [1.08, 17.63], respectively, compared to those without dementia. The group with dementia had a significantly longer median LHS than the group without dementia. Conclusion Older age and dementia significantly increased the risk of mortality, respiratory failure, and ICU admission among COVID‐19 patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.037

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.354
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & Dementia→Same topicLong-Term Effects of COVID-19→French-language works237,207→