Critical superflows and thermodynamic instabilities in superfluids
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this work, we study the linear stability of superfluid phases of matter irrespective of the nature of microscopic degrees of freedom and the strength of interactions between them. Famously, assuming invariance under Galilean boosts and a phonon-roton single-particle dispersion relation, Landau predicted superfluid helium 4 would become unstable for large enough superfluid velocities. Here, we demonstrate that such instabilities generically follow from a change of sign of one of the eigenvalues of the matrix of second derivatives of the free energy. Our only assumption is the existence of static thermodynamic equilibrium, irrespective of any invariance under boosts or microscopic statistics. Turning on dissipation, we show that a linear dynamical instability also develops, leading to exponential growth in time of perturbations around equilibrium. Specializing to Galilean superfluids and assuming the existence of bosonic quasiparticles, our criterion reproduces Landau's critical velocity for Bose-Einstein condensates. Our criterion also reduces to the well-known maximal supercurrent in weakly coupled superconductors described either by Landau-Ginzburg or Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer theory. Further, it correctly reproduces the onset of the instability in relativistic, strongly coupled superfluids without quasiparticles at zero as well as finite temperature, which we construct using gauge/gravity duality. As a less trivial application of our criterion, we show that in dirty superfluids the instability manifests itself first in the thermal diffusion mode instead of the superfluid sound mode. Our work provides a simple, comprehensive, and unified description of the large superflow instability of superfluids and superconductors at any temperature independent of the microscopic details of the system and the strength of interactions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".