FEASIBILITY OF REMOTELY SUPERVISED ONLINE CHAIR YOGA INTERVENTION FOR OLDER ADULTS WITH DEMENTIA
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract This study assessed the feasibility of a remotely supervised online chair yoga (CY) intervention for older adults with dementia, exploring preliminary effects of CY on chronic pain, mobility, risk of falling, sleep disturbance, autonomic reactivity, cardiac rhythms (using IOM2 biofeedback device), and loneliness in this population. Using a one-group pretest/posttest design, a home-based CY intervention was delivered remotely to a group of 10 older adults with dementia who were socially isolated due to COVID-19. The online intervention was conducted twice weekly in 60-minute sessions for 8 weeks; data were collected virtually at baseline, mid-intervention, and post-intervention. Results indicated that online CY is a feasible approach for managing physical and psychological symptoms in older adults with dementia, based on retention (70%) and adherence (87.5%) with no injuries or other adverse events during the intervention. Senior-friendly videoconferencing should be available so that more older adults can gain access to the online intervention
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".