OLDER CANADIAN WOMEN'S LIVING ARRANGEMENTS AND WELL-BEING DURING COVID-19
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Living alone has been associated with lower COVID-related well-being over the course of the pandemic, although the results for women – particularly older Canadian women – depend on myriad factors. This study examines relationships between COVID-19 impact, living arrangement, and two types of well-being – psychological well-being and meaning in life – among Canadian women (N = 106) with Mage = 70.11 in two waves of data (July-September 2020 and March-May 2021). There were no differences in levels of well-being between T1 and T2, although regression analyses showed that correlates differed for type of well-being measured. Surprisingly, COVID-19 impact was only significant for psychological well-being at T1. Additionally, while levels of well-being did not differ by living arrangement at T1, by T2 both were lower for those living alone. Findings suggest adaptation to COVID-19 constraints and highlight changes in factors associated with well-being as well as the necessity of measuring well-being in multiple ways.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".