MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4312104699 · doi:10.1093/geroni/igac059.559

POPULATION TRENDS IN HEALTHCARE USE BY MEXICAN ADULTS AGED 60 AND OLDER WITH AND WITHOUT COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT

2022· article· en· W4312104699 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueInnovation in Aging · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAging, Health, and Disability
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineOdds ratioOddsContext (archaeology)PopulationGerontologyCognitionHealth careCognitive impairmentOutpatient clinicMontreal Cognitive AssessmentDemographyLogistic regressionPsychiatryEnvironmental healthInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Government policies that have greatly expanded health insurance coverage in Mexico have taken place in the context of rapid population aging and an increasing number of older adults living with cognitive impairment. We used data from the Mexican Health and Aging Study to investigate population-level trends in self-reported healthcare use by cognitive status in 2001, 2012, 2015, and 2018. Healthcare measures included having an outpatient procedure, any doctor visits, staying >1 nights in the hospital, and screenings for high cholesterol, diabetes, and hypertension. All outcomes were dichotomized as yes/no. The sample sizes included 6179 (2001), 8924 (2012), 9429 (2015), and 8916 (2018) participants aged 60 and older who completed a direct interview (total N=33,448). Participants with cognitive impairment were identified using five cognitive assessments (2001 n=1000; 2012 n=1273; 2015 n=1467; 2018 n=1372). Generalized estimating equations that adjusted for demographic characteristics and self-reported health conditions were used. The adjusted odds of having spent >1 night in the hospital, outpatient procedures, any doctor visits, and preventive screenings were significantly higher in 2012, 2015, and 2018 than in 2001 regardless of cognitive status. Overall, participants with cognitive impairment had significantly higher adjusted odds for >1 nights in the hospital (OR=1.31, 95% CI=1.20-1.42), but significantly lower odds for any doctor visits (OR=0.81, 95% CI=0.75-0.88), outpatient procedures (OR=0.70, 95% CI=0.57-0.85), and preventive screenings for high cholesterol (OR=0.75, 95% CI=-.70-0.81), diabetes (OR=0.78, 95% CI=0.72-0.85), and hypertension (OR=0.76, 95% CI=0.70-0.82). These results are important to understanding the healthcare needs of Mexico’s growing older adult population.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it