Delineating mouse β-cell identity during lifetime and in diabetes with a single cell atlas
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Multiple pancreatic islet single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) datasets have been generated to study development, homeostasis, and diabetes. However, there is no consensus on cell states and pathways across conditions as well as the value of preclinical mouse models. Since these challenges can only be resolved by jointly analyzing multiple datasets, we present a scRNA-seq cross-condition mouse islet atlas (MIA). We integrated over 300,000 cells from nine datasets with 56 samples, varying in age, sex, and diabetes models, including an autoimmune type 1 diabetes (T1D) model (NOD), a gluco-/lipotoxicity T2D model (db/db), and a chemical streptozotocin (STZ) β-cell ablation model. MIA is a curated resource for interactive exploration and computational querying, providing new insights inaccessible from individual datasets. The β-cell landscape of MIA revealed new disease progression cell states and cross-publication differences between previously suggested marker genes. We show that in the STZ model β-cells transcriptionally correlate to human T2D and mouse db/db, but are less similar to human T1D and mouse NOD. We observe different pathways shared between immature, aged, and diabetes model β-cells. In conclusion, our work presents the first comprehensive analysis of β-cell responses to different stressors, providing a roadmap for the understanding of β-cell plasticity, compensation, and demise.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".