MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4312123793 · doi:10.1007/978-1-4842-8710-1_1

Introduction to Warps

2022· book-chapter· en· W4312123793 on OpenAlexaff
Jennifer Harder

Bibliographic record

VenueApress eBooks · 2022
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIndustrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
Canadian institutionsDelta-Q Technologies (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDistortion (music)Set (abstract data type)WorkspaceObject (grammar)Computer scienceComputer visionComputer graphics (images)PixelArtificial intelligenceTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Chapter goals: Set up a workspace in Photoshop. Learn about true warps and distorts versus just touching up pixels in a photo. Knowing how to warp images can be useful when working on various Photoshop projects to either distort an object or correct a distortion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.260
Threshold uncertainty score0.870

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.005
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2600.169

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApress eBooksSame topicIndustrial Vision Systems and Defect DetectionFrench-language works237,207