MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4312131348 · doi:10.34005/kinerja.v5i01.2200

PERAN KELOMPOK SADAR WISATA DALAM MENGEMBANGKAN TAMAN WISATA LAUT LABUHAN SEPULU BANGKALAN

2022· article· id· W4312131348 on OpenAlexaff
Khoirun Nisa, Raden Mas Mohammad Wispandono

Bibliographic record

VenueKinerja · 2022
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCommunity-based Tourism Development and Sustainability
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesSociologyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui peran kelompok sadar wisata (pokdarwis) dalam mengembangkan taman wisata laut serta faktor pendukung dan penghambat dalam pengelolaannya. Taman Wisata Laut Labuhan merupakan salah satu wisata alam yang terletak di Dusun Masaran, Desa Labuhan, Kecamatan Sepulu, Kabupaten Bangkalan. Jenis penelitian ini adalah penelitian kualitatif dengan metode kualitatif-deskriptif yang bertujuan untuk menjelaskan dan menggambarkan secara mendalam tentang peran pokdarwis dalam mengembangkan taman wisata laut. Teknik pengumpulan data pada penelitian ini yaitu observasi, wawancara dan dokumentasi. Dengan melakukan pengumpulan data primer dan data sekuner. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa terdapat enam Peran Pokdarwis Payung Kuning dalam mengembangkan Taman Wisata Laut. Keberhasilan Taman Wisata Laut tidak hanya dipengaruhi oleh Pokdarwis Payung Kuning, namun partisipasi masyarakat sekitar dalam mengembangkan potensi yang dimiliki serta pemahaman masyarakat tentang pentingnya menjaga dan merawat alam. Sehingga peran pokdarwis berpengaruh positif terhadap pengelolaan Taman Wisata Laut dan masyarakat di Desa dalam bidang pemberdayaan masyarakat. Kata kunci: Desa Labuhan, Peran Pokdarwis, Pengembangan Wisata

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.061
Threshold uncertainty score0.206

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0100.007
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0610.028

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueKinerjaSame topicCommunity-based Tourism Development and SustainabilityFrench-language works237,207