MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

102 Trends in child pedestrian collision injuries by neighbourhood deprivation in Toronto, Canada

2022· article· en· W4312134816 on OpenAlex
Colin Macarthur, Naomi B. Schwartz, Linda Rothman, Andrew Howard

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueAbstracts · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTraffic and Road Safety
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan UniversityInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeighbourhood (mathematics)PedestrianDemographyPoisson regressionGeographyConfidence intervalMedicinePsychologySociologyMathematicsPopulationInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<h3>Background</h3> Pedestrian motor vehicle collisions are a leading cause of death and disability among Canadian children (0–19 years). The objective of this study was to examine trends in child pedestrian motor vehicle collision injury rates by neighbourhood deprivation in Toronto, Canada. <h3>Methods</h3> Police-reported child pedestrian injuries (killed or seriously injured; KSI) from 2000–2019 were mapped onto 140 neighbourhoods in Toronto. Neighbourhood deprivation tertiles (low, medium, and highly deprived) were designated using the 2016 Ontario Marginalization Index. Poisson regression analyses examined KSI rates by deprivation and five-year time interval, controlling for location (urban core versus inner suburbs). Interaction terms (deprivation/location and time interval) were also estimated. <h3>Results</h3> Between 2000–2019, 523 child pedestrian KSI were reported. Injury rates were inversely associated with deprivation. A decrease in KSI rates (&gt; 50%) was seen across all neighbourhood deprivation tertiles. The steepest decline in KSI rates occurred from 2000–2010. In the multivariate models, deprivation and interaction terms were non-significant. Toronto’s urban core showed higher child KSI rates, and a significantly faster decline in rates, compared with the outer suburbs. <h3>Conclusions</h3> Toronto child pedestrian KSI rates declined steeply from 2000–2019. Declines were observed uniformly across deprivation tertiles, and steepest in the urban core. Decreases in child pedestrian KSI rates may be attributed to traffic policies implemented in the early 2000s, e.g., city-wide speed limit reductions. <h3>Learning Outcomes</h3> Child pedestrian motor vehicle collision KSI rates have declined steeply over the last two decades in Toronto. Declines were consistent across deprivation tertiles, and steepest in the urban core.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.955
Threshold uncertainty score0.488

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it