MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4312138162 · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-2307680/v1

Health facilities preparedness to deliver maternal and newborn health care in Kilifi and Kisii Counties, Kenya

2022· preprint· en· W4312138162 on OpenAlexfundno aff
James Orwa, Marleen Temmerman, Lucy Nyaga, Kennedy Mulama, Stanley Lüchters

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Square · 2022
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlobal Maternal and Child Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersGovernment of CanadaGovernment of the Republic of KenyaAga Khan Foundation CanadaAga Khan Foundation
KeywordsPreparednessHealth facilityStaffingHealth careMedicineMedical emergencyReferralEnvironmental healthBusinessGovernment (linguistics)NursingHealth servicesPopulationEconomic growth

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction: Health facility preparedness to deliver quality maternal and newborn care reduces maternal and newborn morbidity and mortality by avoiding the three delays (delay in deciding to seek care from a skilled attendant by pregnant woman; delay in reaching the facility with capacity to offer basic emergency obstetric care; and delay in receiving emergency care upon reaching a health facility). Rapid assessment and review of previous health records has shown that 16 health facilities in rural Kenya had poor maternal and newborn indicators. As a result, support was given to these facilities by providing basic emergency obstetric and newborn care (BEmONC) and comprehensive emergency obstetric and newborn care (CEmONC) training to providers, provision of equipment and supplies, and strengthening referral linkages. This study described the preparedness of the facilities to deliver maternal and newborn health care services at the end of the project implementation. Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted in targeted rural counties of Kilifi and Kisii counties in December 2019 covering 16 Government of Kenya (GoK) health facilities to describe the preparedness of the facilities to deliver maternal and newborn healthcare services by examining the availability of drugs, commodities, equipment, staffing, general requirements (water and electricity, and guidelines), and the ability to perform. The results of the assessment are described using frequency and percentages, and comparative synthesis. Results: All of the 16 facilities were offering routine ANC and normal vaginal delivery services, however only two were providing CEmONC services. Most of the essential medicines and commodities were available in most of the health facilities as well as the required equipment. BEmONC and CEmONC guidelines were available in Kilifi health facilities and none in Kisii. There was only one staff in each county available 24/7 for Caesarian Section (CS) and only one anesthetist available in Kilifi. Electricity was available in all the facilities, however only half had secondary power supply. All the facilities offering CS were equipped with generators as a secondary power back-up. Conclusion: The health facilities reported availability of most of the drugs, commodities, and equipment than on general requirements as per their level of operation, however staffing and guidelines were limited. Facilities in Kilifi performed better than in Kisii. To deliver quality maternal and newborn health services, more support is required towards general infrastructure and human resources. Continuous monitoring of these services will help in the allocation of resources based on the need of the health facilities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.049
Threshold uncertainty score0.098

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.409
Teacher spread0.368 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch Square→Same topicGlobal Maternal and Child Health→French-language works237,207→